Dear Brothers and Sisters,
While eating lunch with a pastor friend of mine (from another church), we discussed his reasons for believing Christ’s birth should be celebrated in September, not December: 1) Jesus was more likely to have been born on one of Israel’s autumn festivals than at the end of the year, and 2) Christmas is a pagan holiday. We discussed both assertions at length, and though he agreed that the word “Christmas” is not of pagan origin (it’s from a Latin expression meaning “Christ is sent”), he would not budge from his position, which was based on his use of an argument known as “the fallacy of origins” (or “the genetic fallacy”) in which a perceived defect in the origin of an idea or thing is taken to be evidence that discredits that idea or thing itself. According to this faulty line of reasoning, the truth of an idea or thing is rejected based on its source rather than on its merit. Here are two examples:
- Wedding rings were invented by pagans, therefore wearing a wedding ring is unChristian.
- The word “cereal” comes from the name of the pagan goddess Ceres, therefore Christians should not eat cereal.
Those not realizing the fallacy of such reasoning risk falling prey to the myths and misinformation that often surface when the origin of Christmas is raised. Even if the day is somehow incidentally related to less-than-Christian practices of the past, that association does not determine the meaning Christians (in the early church and today) attribute to Christmas. It’s enough to know that Christ was born on a day in history, in flesh and blood, space and time, for us and our salvation so that we might be born from above by God’s Word and Spirit. By assigning December 25 on the church calendar to celebrating Jesus’ birth, we as Christians are able to celebrate together, and then invite others to join in.
The meaning Christians attribute to Christmas comes from our services of worship on that day, which include readings of relevant Scripture, the preaching of messages expounding those readings, and the singing of hymns and carols that proclaim the joyous, biblical message of Christ’s birth. For us, the meaning of Christmas is determined by the object to which our celebrations point: Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Son of God.
Is Christmas rooted in paganism? Historians (and others) have long debated that question. In the History Today article [1] reproduced below, British journalist Matt Salusbury debunks some of the claims frequently made in that debate, and we’ve linked similar articles in the second footnote [2] to shed light on the debate which often is filled with misinformation and outright superstition. But the bottom line is this: incidental associations of Christmas with non-Christian practices do not determine the meaning of the day for Christians. Jesus Christ gives Christmas its meaning.
Did the first Christian Roman emperor appropriate the pagan festival of Saturnalia to celebrate the birth of Christ? Matt Salusbury weighs the evidence.
It was a public holiday celebrated around December 25th in the family home. A time for feasting, goodwill, generosity to the poor, the exchange of gifts and the decoration of trees. But it wasn’t Christmas. This was Saturnalia, the pagan Roman winter solstice festival. But was Christmas, Western Christianity’s most popular festival, derived from the pagan Saturnalia?
The first-century AD poet Gaius Valerius Catullus described Saturnalia as ‘the best of times’: dress codes were relaxed, small gifts such as dolls, candles and caged birds were exchanged.
Saturnalia saw the inversion of social roles. The wealthy were expected to pay the month’s rent for those who couldn’t afford it, masters and slaves to swap clothes. Family households threw dice to determine who would become the temporary Saturnalian monarch. The poet Lucian of Samosata (AD 120-180) has the god Cronos (Saturn) say in his poem, Saturnalia:
‘During my week the serious is barred: no business allowed. Drinking and being drunk, noise and games of dice, appointing of kings and feasting of slaves, singing naked, clapping … an occasional ducking of corked faces in icy water – such are the functions over which I preside.’
Saturnalia originated as a farmer’s festival to mark the end of the autumn planting season in honour of Saturn (satus means sowing). Numerous archaeological sites from the Roman coastal province of Constantine, now in Algeria, demonstrate that the cult of Saturn survived there until the early third century AD.
Saturnalia grew in duration and moved to progressively later dates under the Roman period. During the reign of the Emperor Augustus (63 BC-AD 14), it was a two-day affair starting on December 17th. By the time Lucian described the festivities, it was a seven-day event. Changes to the Roman calendar moved the climax of Saturnalia to December 25th, around the time of the date of the winter solstice.
From as early as 217 BC there were public Saturnalia banquets. The Roman state cancelled executions and refrained from declaring war during the festival. Pagan Roman authorities tried to curtail Saturnalia; Emperor Caligula (AD 12-41) sought to restrict it to five days, with little success.
Emperor Domitian (AD 51-96) may have changed Saturnalia’s date to December 25th in an attempt to assert his authority. He curbed Saturnalia’s subversive tendencies by marking it with public events under his control. The poet Statius (AD 45- 95), in his poem Silvae, describes the lavish banquet and entertainments Domitian presided over, including games which opened with sweets, fruit and nuts showered on the crowd and featuring flights of flamingos released over Rome. Shows with fighting dwarves and female gladiators were illuminated, for the first time, into the night.
The conversion of Emperor Constantine to Christianity in AD 312 ended Roman persecution of Christians and began imperial patronage of the Christian churches. But Christianity did not become the Roman Empire’s official religion overnight. Dr David Gwynn, lecturer in ancient and late antique history at Royal Holloway, University of London, says that, alongside Christian and other pagan festivals, ‘the Saturnalia continued to be celebrated in the century afterward’.
The poet Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius wrote about another Saturnalia, describing a banquet of pagan literary celebrities in Rome during the festival. Classicists date the work to between AD 383 and 430, so it describes a Saturnalia alive and well under Christian emperors. The Christian calendar of Polemius Silvus, written around AD 449, mentions Saturnalia, recording that ‘it used to honour the god Saturn’. This suggests it had by then become just another popular carnival.
Christmas apparently started – like Saturnalia – in Rome, and spread to the eastern Mediterranean. The earliest known reference to it commemorating the birth of Christ on December 25th is in the Roman Philocalian calendar of AD 354. Provincial schisms soon resulted in different Christian calendars. The Orthodox Church in the Eastern (Byzantine) half of the Roman Empire fixed the date of Christmas at January 6th, commemorating simultaneously Christ’s birth, baptism and first miracle.
Saturnalia has a rival contender as the forerunner of Christmas: the festival of dies natalis solis invicti, ‘birthday of the unconquered sun’. The Philocalian calendar also states that December 25th was a Roman civil holiday honouring the cult of sol invicta. With its origins in Syria and the monotheistic cult of Mithras, sol invicta certainly has similarities to the worship of Jesus. The cult was introduced into the empire in AD 274 by Emperor Aurelian (214-275), who effectively made it a state religion, putting its emblem on Roman coins.
Sol invicta succeeded because of its ability to assimilate aspects of Jupiter and other deities into its figure of the Sun King, reflecting the absolute power of ‘divine’emperors. But despite efforts by later pagan emperors to control Saturnalia and absorb the festival into the official cult, the sol invicta ended up looking very much like the old Saturnalia. Constantine, the first Christian emperor, was brought up in the sol invicta cult, in what was by then already a predominantly monotheist empire: ‘It is therefore possible,’ says Dr Gwynn, ‘that Christmas was intended to replace this festival rather than Saturnalia.’
Gwynn concludes: ‘The majority of modern scholars would be reluctant to accept any close connection between the Saturnalia and the emergence of the Christian Christmas.’
Devout Christians will be reassured to learn that the date of Christmas may derive from concepts in Judaism that link the time of the deaths of prophets being linked to their conception or birth. From this, early ecclesiastical number-crunchers extrapolated that the nine months of Mary’s pregnancy following the Annunciation on March 25th would produce a December 25th date for the birth of Christ.
—Matt Salusbury
(public domain)
I praise God for leading GCI out of faulty reasoning, errors of fact, and various misinterpretations concerning the celebration of Christ’s birth at Christmas. We join with the host of Christians down the centuries in celebrating Jesus’ birth on the traditional day, knowing that the incarnation of the Son of God is central to God’s plan to save humankind. Regardless of the actual day of the birth of Immanuel (God with us), his birth is more than worthy of our celebration. As Jesus’ followers, we celebrate together, rejoicing in the amazing, sacrificial love of our Triune God seen in the birth of Jesus Christ over 2,000 years ago in Bethlehem.
Celebrating Jesus and his birth,
Joseph Tkach
________________
[1] This History Today article was first published in December 2009 (volume 59, 12). It is reproduced here with the publisher’s permission with History Today retaining the copyright. To read the article online, click here.
[2] This is the first letter in a series about Christmas—its origin, dating, and contemporary Christian celebration. To read the other letters, click here and here (and for a compilation of all three merged into one article, click here). For other articles debunking claims concerning the pagan origin for Christmas celebrations, click here, here and here.
Much could be said about this topic. I well realize the various sensitivities involved. I have met some of the more notorious objections to the celebration. Certainly the “pagan origin” argument was amongst them. Some Christians avoid and/or reject Christmas because they believe that only biblical celebrations instituted by God’s direct commands ought to be celebrated. Since “Christmas” was not instituted by God, so the critics, it should not find a place in the Christian liturgical calendar.
The articles explained the history of the Christmas celebration. Not everyone will agree with every mentioned detail, but the material is thought provoking and deserves serious consideration. The “once pagan always pagan” objection is weak. Let me illustrate. Just because
pagans had temples and priestly orders this did not keep OT Israel from having a temple and the Levitical priesthood. We could also mention the Christian conversion experience.The “once pagan, always pagan” argument would in fact deny the amazing changes that people can experience in their lives when they accept Christianity. Space does not allow for further examples. Also, when we look at the Bible we find celebrations instituted by God’s people. These celebrations were reminders of God’s great saving acts and served as important historical event markers in the history of Israel. The birth of our Savior is an event deserving celebration. This is surely the picture we see in the Gospels.
And so, as for me and my household, we are not ashamed to wish everyone a meaningful and joyous Advent season.
Christ is born!
Trinitarian theologian Paul Metzger has a new post on the Patheos blog that shares similar thoughts to those from Joseph Tkach in the Weekly Update post above. To read Metzger’s post, go to http://www.patheos.com/blogs/uncommongodcommongood/2016/12/put-christ-back-christmas/.
Thank you for the post and for addressing this matter again. The arguments held in favor of the “once pagan always pagan” as you state are not new and have been often used in reference to our worship day(s) as well as other practices. However, if these arguments were to have some merit it would be sufficient to point out how in many countries the days of the week are ALL named after pagan gods. Does that mean we cannot worship God, the true God, on any day of the week? Of course, this would be a preposterous conclusion. The fact is that days, months, seasons, and even years and cycles of years have all been associated with pagan religious practices. Rather than allowing those practices to dictate when we can or cannot worship God (which by the way would be much the same as stating that the worship of the true God should in a way be limited by pagan gods and practices), we should recognize that He is the Creator and redeemer of time, and that any and all time is suitable for the worship and service of our Lord and Savior, regardless of whether any of it has been used for any other purpose. Should we not always rejoice as we behold the miracle of the incarnation? So, then why not on December 25th?
Wishing everyone an inspiring and blessed Christmas (that is a blessed reminder of the human birth of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ) on this December 25th and every other day of the year.